Loading...

Get Up Make Love: 21st Sentury Space Sexploration

Written By: Jason Louv
Date Published: February 2, 2010

Scenes from NASA's history. Photo: nasa.govI can't say that I'm particularly surprised by Obama's new plan to scarper plans of government-funded human space exploration. NASA's till has been empty for decades -- yet with this continued elimination of space agency funds for getting people into space, it feels like we're letting go of something vitally important.

We weren't supposed to just get up there to plant some flags and analyze some rocks, and then give up because we'd won the game of King of the Hill. What happened to the Great Dream?

It's been twenty years since the Cold War ended. Now, in our global bureaucratic paper shuffle, it feels like we've lost some of the fight, the big project, the sense of having a goal. Now we're drowning in our lack of motivation, bereft of that big vision of space that, for a small period of time, gave us a forward imperative, something inspiring enough to get our minds out of our collective crap, our business-as-usual-on-planet-Earth nonsense. Resource skirmishes, religious friction, global warming, and Obama just don't really cut it in the same way the Space Race did; now, in the twenty-first century, it seems like we're just coping and making do instead of pushing forward. We've taken a big step backward from “one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind.” We lost interest because space isn't sexy anymore -- and that's the problem right there.

Allow me to make a potentially helpful observation here. Space is fundamentally about sex.  And by eroticizing space, instead of militarizing it, we can do wonders for our limp interest.

Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space OdysseyThe space race itself was always erotic. Rockets blasting into the big wide open. More fuel and bigger thrusters. The rush to see which white-suited tadpole spaceman (sperm) could land on (fertilize) the moon for their genetic group first. Stanley Kubrick made a study of that in 2001. It's a running trope in science fiction.

But space is about sex for a much more crucial reason. It's about overpopulation. Sex makes human beings -- more human beings than what we know what to do with. And we'll eventually need to get into space to find somewhere to put them. It's a problem -- but there's one place we haven't looked for the solution to the problem: the “problem” itself. Sex creates overpopulation, and it can get us past it. Sexuality itself is the most potent tool we have for properly focusing our lives. And we can use it to focus our lives, as a group, on evolving the species instead of just propagating it. We can use it for getting into space.

I'm not talking about having sex in space. I'm talking about having sex with space.

Sexuality is the most powerful force in the human nervous system. The use of this force for directed, non-reproductive purposes has long been the key, jealously-guarded secret of most world religions and secret societies that have all long known that bthe human nervous system can be imprinted by orgasm and that what you sexually fixate on can quickly become the reality you live in.

Orgasm is a force. Morality has nothing to do with it. Orgasm is a force. It is one that has been kept in check by millennia of social conditioning, but it is something we should ultimately regard as dispassionately as electricity, magnetism, or gravity. Orgasm creates. It can create human beings or it can create other things. You decide. It's a force.

Orgasm is our direct line to all that exists outside time and space. We normally use it to bring down souls into manifest reality from outside time and space. Why not use it to bring down other things from outside time and space? Like more positive futures for all of us, instead of just more hungry mouths?

All of our fussing and fighting and moralizing over sexuality amounts to arguing over whether “God” hates us for having fire or electricity or magnetism. We have been in the dark ages, and it's time to just stop.

Barbarella. Photo: wikipedia.orgWhat we sexually fixate on creates our reality. Internet filth and fetishism are nice and all, but why not aim for the stars? What happened to the big Space Quest? Space used to be sexy — remember Timothy Leary's floating space stations, Kennedy's eroto-politics, Barbarella, Bond and Holly Goodhead getting it on in Moonraker? If we could harness the sexual juice poured into the Internet every day and aim it toward the stars, just think what we could achieve. What could be more clear? The orgone force must be pointed towards the stars.

Don't use sexuality to further pollute planet Earth. Use it as a spaceship. Forget Earth, with its grime and disappointment. Forget the last four decades of disaster capitalism and electronic distraction. Space. Space. There's a whole universe out there waiting to be sexplored.

Praxis. Visualize infinite space every time you have an orgasm. Watch years of sexual conditioning fall away while your life opens up into infinite new territories. Just consider... mystics since time immemorial have meditated to unite with the universe. Well, why not take a more direct route?

- Jason Louv, 2010 (The Year We Make Contact)

Jason Louv is the author and editor of the books Generation Hex, Ultraculture and Thee Psychick Bible, and a blogger at the popular culture journal Dangerous Minds. Contact: www.jasonlouv.com

Comments

Space

http://vimeo.com/7761485
Expertly shot & edited. Done with so much insight & attention to detail that most women who see it can't believe it was created by a man.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0033811/
jeff, great job on your short.
> very clean. i am impressed
> peace
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1843310/

Quote from Valkyrie

Quote from Valkyrie Ice
"Nothing motivates progress like someone seeing a way to profit."

Rule of acquisition #?
Sorry, couldn't resist
I still think space is sexy and frankly I hate to see it privatization/commercialized or what ever you want to call it. I am afraid that this will just mean that the information will not be public. Do you really think a company is going to allow the public to come and watch launches (without paying) or have web sites where you can go and learn all kinds of new discoveries in the space program? No, no that will be the end of "sexy" in space travel.
Well, I guess we still have astronomy.

Stanley Kubrick?

You do know that it wasn't his original idea, right? That it was written mostly by Arthur C. Clarke, based on stories he'd written as much as 20 years before the movie was released?

Ok, just checking.

Why don't cooperate like we

Why don't cooperate like we already did in ISS and ITER projects? Building lunar base is not less expensive.

Personally, privatization of

Personally, privatization of space has been a much needed step for over forty years. Once Apollo had been abandoned, space needed to be turned over to private industry. Nothing motivates progress like someone seeing a way to profit. He hasn't just "defunded Nasa", he's opened the gate to private industries, and hoping to encourage those industries with government support. It's investing in potential industries which could reap enormous reward for both the public and private sectors. It's very similar to the way the early airlines were encouraged with mail delivery route contracts. By contracting non government industries, they are encouraging growth of those industries. NASA never had to turn a profit, so a few launches a month were fine. Private industry has to make profits, and to do that, they are going to be doing a LOT more than just resupplying the ISS. Think dozens of launches a day. Why send 1 eighty million dollar probe to Mars when you can send eighty 1 million dollar ones?

By keeping space under lock and key, NASA has done more to kill space exploration than it has to encourage it. Sure, this isn't the sexy "Shoot for the Moon", but it is like comparing Lewis and Clark to the furtrappers who really did all the mapping and scouting out of the west. Sure, L&C made a heroic trip, found the west coast, etc, but it took people looking to profit to do the grunt work. The hero's had their day. Now it's time for those who no-one will sing songs about to get the real job done.

If you have really truly desired to see space opened to the masses, then this should be the best news you've had since Apollo. Space isn't a government monopoly anymore. It's everybody's game now. And with the profusion of technologies like the "Mach" effect thruster, and the "space launch cannon" or even the progress being made towards a Space Elevator, we might see some serious progress in space technology over the next decade or two. America will never be the powerhouse of manufacturing again, but we could become the powerhouse in space technology. A massively increased space industry in private hands could generate millions of jobs over the next decade.

And you are right, sex sells. And space is the final frontier. We need to change the image of space from the "Right Stuff" to the "Try our 0G LUV Beds!" attitude. Space isn't solely for geeks and scientists, it needs to be appealing to the masses as well. And the key to that is taking it out of the hands of Government, and letting the private sector turn it into a tourist trap as quickly as possible. The government can't market space in the way it needs to be done without outraging too many uptight "moralists".

NASA has been a Gatekeeper to the stars. It's about time the wall came down, and the Gatekeepers retired. We don't need gatekeepers anymore. We need taxi drivers, redlight space stations, and honeymoon spacehotels. We need Lunar Cruise ships, and Martian space liners. And the ONLY way to get there is to turn space over to private industry.

It's Just Randy, Baby!

One small step for man, one incremental advance for mankind! It's hard to find space sexy when the technology's based on hundred-year old principles & the agency spends more time marketing its value than it does improving its technologies.

Long story short: the public responds to change, and doesn't respond to stagnation - if NASA wants to reinvigorate itself, then it'll have to execute brilliantly on daring, innovative endeavors rather than its current mission hauling equipment for space-telescopes & deploying satellites.

The public has shifted attention away from space because nothing new is happening in the industry. When somebody finally does make that next great leap (probably fusion-powered spacecraft), then maybe we'll see a return to the love of the unknown that we currently only find in remakes of cheesy space-westerns.

Failure may not be an option, but it does happen - sometimes spectacularly, but usually more quietly, as people simply change the channel to something with more immediacy & relevancy to their daily lives...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.