Loading...

Overclocking the Human CPU

A primer for the future of human intelligence
Written By: James Kent
Date Published: March 19, 2009 | View more articles in:

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up


Subscribe to h+ RSS Feeds

Overclocking the Human CPU

Although the human imagination is capable of many things, it is very difficult to imagine being smarter than we are now. We may be able to envision a life where the average human can hold hundreds of facts in working memory and manipulate them all with perfect accuracy and efficiency, but it is hard to imagine what that would feel like. How much more would we “know” due to the heightened capacity of our super-genius intellect? Would the feeling be cold and computer-like; would it be eerily prescient and clairvoyant? Would it be god-like?

These are more than just rhetorical questions. While we 21st century humans are currently locked within the framework of our genetic neural architecture, our species has gotten to the point where we can routinely tweak and build on the physical traits we’re born into with some training, chemical or surgical tinkering, and/or targeted genetic alteration. Messing with the fabric of human intelligence may be an ethical black area in today’s climate, but superintelligence research is well under way in many forms right now. We’re heading into a future we can hardly begin to imagine with our primitive brains.

Human intelligence is already progressing in ways we cannot accurately measure. The sheer force of evolution, culture, and centuries of written language has imprinted our neural DNA with the networks needed to process abstract symbols and draw complex hypothetical conclusions based on available data sets. This is the core of human intelligence: the ability to compare, contrast, and juxtapose sets of data against each other in order to draw accurate conclusions and predict likely outcomes.

Unfortunately, our mental toolkit is comically weak, allowing us to only hold five to seven variables for comparing and contrasting at any one time, and constantly needing to “dump” whatever is in working memory when distracted by new tasks. Lame! Not only is our working bandwidth low, our long-term memory is lossy, leaving us to rely on external storage methods (ideas encoded in symbols or bits) to communicate rational output to other people and keep track of all the new “information” we create over time. For creatures that have short unpredictable lives, this limited setup might be okay, but for modern humans it leaves us wanting more, better, faster.

Since we have external memory storage down (thanks, Internet!), this leaves personal working-memory bandwidth the most lacking of human traits in our time. In biophysical terms the bandwidth of our intelligence is limited to a tiny conduit of neural cables running from our working memory in the brain’s frontal lobes, back to the abstract symbol processing networks in the parietal lobes, and back to the working memory again. This intelligence circuit is where all the heavy-duty puzzle solving goes down when you’re reading a map or working a Sudoku grid. Human problemsolving requires that data moving along this circuit be fast for focus and precision (good conductivity) and robust for complexity of thought (dense wiring). Increased speed and connectivity along this circuit is where the future of human intelligence lies, and there are only a few ways to get it moving in the right direction.

Since we have external memory storage down (thanks, Internet!), this leaves personal working-memory bandwidth the most lacking of human traits in our time.

At one point in time it seemed that drugs were the answer to this question: Dexedrine and piracetam, cognitive enhancers, ginko, ephedra, nootropics, and the like. While these supplements are indeed nifty for achieving short-term focus and mental clarity, they seem to only milk the limited capacity of our current wetware without providing the instantaneous multi-point IQ boost we would expect from our “smart drugs.” Drugs can increase human intelligence temporarily by increasing the speed and conductivity along the intelligence circuit. However, most of the evidence to date suggests that the brain will eventually begin to power-down or tip into psychotic states if this method is used or abused for too long. To build long-term conductivity you need to train your mental reflexes just as you would train your hand-eye reflexes, and like any training this takes long periods of discipline to see even limited results. Books, video games, and websites that focus on multistage puzzle solving in strict time limits (yes, I’m talking about Tetris) are probably the best way to get the logic circuit wires crackling and ready for more complex problem-solving, but what about improving the robust capacity we crave?

Data capacity, bandwidth, or robustness along the intelligence circuit is the main shortcoming of human intelligence, and what divides the geniuses from the morons. In real terms, this metric defines how many abstract symbols we can hold in working memory at any one time while still performing rational analysis on those objects. For instance, how many words from the last paragraph could you recall if you closed your eyes right now? Could you remember enough words to complete a simple seventeen- syllable haiku in thirty seconds or less without any errors? No? Why not?

If you can do it you’re probably a genius, because that means you have the capacity to hold at least ten or more random words in your working memory while performing rule-based contextual algorithms to rearrange logical syntactical output under strict time limits. A computer could do it in a snap, but the limitations of our working memory make this all but impossible. This capacity is a trait we cannot easily improve in a lifetime, not without radical mental training, dodgy neural steroid hormones, or even dodgier drug-induced neural plasticity. What we do know is that this capacity for robust intelligence is genetically inherited, which naturally gives some people the upper hand. According to Richard Haier of the University of California, Irvine, one of the initial founders of the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT, referred to here as the intelligence circuit), “Genetic research has demonstrated that intelligence levels can be inherited, and since genes work through biology, there must be a biological basis for intelligence.”

…scientists find a common splice for increasing the efficiency of learning and… neurotrophin supply at specific neural targets, leading to targeted neural growth and plasticity in mammalian neural networks

Since there is most likely a biological basis for intelligence, and intelligence is considered to be a positive survival trait, it is reasonable to assume that humans will get smarter over time just by having sex and making babies, which is a fun (but slow) way to go about solving this problem. The imposed pressures of modern society – such as requisite cultural literacy and basic math skills – also drive the trend toward smarter humans, but simple education and evolution aren’t enough for some people. How do we get people to become more intelligent within a single generation?

…scientists find a common splice for increasing the efficiency of learning and… neurotrophin supply at specific neural targets, leading to targeted neural growth and plasticity in mammalian neural networks

There are a few popular answers to this question. The first is that humans take advantage of brain-computer-interfaces (BCI) to create more robust “offsite” memory and logic processing in a small microchip we keep implanted in our chest or shoulder. The technological foundation for making this work exists today, and is currently used to effectively treat Parkinson’s disease via targeted computer stimulation of dopamine neurons. While the BCI option seems optimal at first pass, the fact that it requires surgery to embed electronics and pass dozens of thin electrodes into our brains at various areas presents ethical roadblocks to research. Perhaps if someone could finagle a sweet big-money grant to cure stupidity via microchip-aided neural synchronization we would see some major progress in this area, but that’s not likely in the U.S.A. anytime soon. Maybe China? Maybe India? Hello, developing world, I hear opportunity calling…

However, the most likely (and potentially darkest) scenario for rapid intelligence increase within a single generation is the genetic one. With all the trendy biotech being thrown down these days it is only a matter of time until scientists find a common splice or knockout method for increasing the efficiency of learning and memory genes and/or neurotrophin supply at specific neural targets, leading to targeted neural growth and plasticity in mammalian neural networks, a technique that will then be applied to neurogenesis and plasticity along the intelligence and motor-skills circuits of animals in vitro in order to create super-functioning organisms. Over a period of decades these methods will of course be secretly tested in humans, resulting in a jump in IQ on the order of two - threefold in a single generation, no doubt spawning a race of Kahn-like supermen who will beat us at chess all the time, grow to loathe us, and ultimately plot to destroy us all. But that’s still a few years out, so go play some Halo 3 to get those hair-trigger reflexes up to snuff. When the black-market neural steroid hormones hit the milk supply we’ll have to hope we don’t all go insane, but at least SAT scores will be through the roof, for once.

James Kent is the former publisher of Psychedelic Illuminations and Trip Magazine. He currently edits DoseNation.com, a multi-user blog featuring drug news, humor, and commentary.

 

Resources: 

Working Memory Capacity
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_memory#Working_memory_capacity

PFIT - Intelligence Circuit
www.physorg.com/news108722746.html

Diversity of Steroid Hormone Actions on the Brain
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=bnchm.section.3529

Drug-induced Neural Plasticity
www.acnp.org/g4/GN401000067/CH067.html

Nootopics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nootropics

Book: Mind Performance Hacks: Tips & Tools for Overclocking Your Brain
www.amazon.com/Mind-Performance-Hacks-Tools-Overclocking/dp/0596101538

VideoGame: Nintendo Brain Age
www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/11/26/brain.training/

Ways to overclock your brain
ririanproject.com/2006/11/03/22-ways-to-overclokyour-brain/
ririanproject.com/2007/05/22/33-new-ways-tooverclock-your-brain

Wired on Neurostim implants
www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2001/08/46278

Neurotrophins
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotrophins

Learning and Memory Plasticity Genes
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070418104300.htm

Mind Fit Brain Training Software Achieves Highest Score in Wall Street Journal Brain Aging Experts Review
www.pr.com/press-release/81533

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up

Comments

I have a fear... a fear that someday in the near future I'll wake up and a frendly booting tone will sound, a fear that someday I'll think my creditcard number too loudly and pay for someones McDonalds, a fear that when I decide to leave a boring party, I will see a popup asking "Do you really want to quit?", and finally a fear that when the robots face off against the humans that I will not be chosen for, but will have to pick a side.

Overclocking the brain will entail an increased metabolism and therefore increased brain temperatures. The brain is designed to dissipate heat. But there is a functional limit to that. I would imagine that the cranial surface area would need to be increased or a heat sinking solution like the crests on top dinosaurs' backs would need to be integrated with the skull. However, there is no doubt that sooner or later human will go down the path of augmenting their cerebral capacity. The last 150 years have been spend at augmenting human mechanical power through machines.

I say it wouldn't feel any different to be super-intelligent, to now.
Except you'd be able to look at complex situations, and "know" the answers, in the same way that you might now look at a level in a puzzle-game, and "know" how to go about solving it. You'd just be able to do that with much more obscure, and entangled evidence.
I think you'd be just as stumped in situations where the evidence was partial, but perhaps you'd be able to imagine many more possibilities, and better subconsciously weigh the possibilities. Again, the "likely" answers would just bubble to your consciousness in the same way as happens now.

Seeing other people who couldn't "see" the answers would become even more frustrating, as the intelligence gap widened. I'm sure we've all been there. Talking with really stupid people it's sometimes quite hard to relate. If you're trying to explain a simple maths concept for example, you can see that they just don't get it, and even see roughly what is going through their minds, but, what is it actually like to be them? Probably just the same as it is to be us, trying to understand string theory.

There's a level of comlexity that one can "see", the answers just jump out, or at least you get a tingling intuitive sense of how to find the solution. Beyond a certain level, it all just gets fuzzy, and you're reduced to the blind mechanical methods you learned in school - divide the problem up, discover problem bounds and constraints, search for analogies, etc.

by reading this i can see that how far we have gone forward that we even started to compare our mind with CPU. The wide usage of internet and technology has just reduced personal thoughts and the softness and the caring that humans had for each other. Slowly but truly we are moving towards a fully mechanized world where "Love & caring" will be strange words

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.