Nanoscale: Robot Arm Places Atoms and Molecules With 100% Accuracy

Written By: Michael Anissimov
Date Published: January 12, 2010 | View more articles in:

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up

Until the mid-1990s, the term "nanotechnology" referred to the goal of creating vast arrays of nanoscale assemblers to fabricate useful human-scale products from scratch in an entirely automated process and with atomic precision. Since then, the word has come to mean anything from stain-resistant pants to branches of conventional chemistry — generally anything involving nanoscale objects. But the dream of a new Industrial Revolution based on nanoscale manufacturing has not died, as demonstrated most vividly by the work of NYU professor of chemistry Dr. Nadrian Seeman.

In a 2009 article in Nature Nanotechnology, Dr. Seeman shared the results of experiments performed by his lab, along with collaborators at Nanjing University in China, in which scientists built a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them. The device was approximately 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size — over a million could fit in a single red blood cell. Using robust error-correction mechanisms, the device can place DNA molecules with 100% accuracy. Earlier trials had yielded only 60-80% accuracy.

The nanorobotic arm is built out of DNA origami: large strands of DNA gently encouraged to fold in precise ways by interaction with a few hundred short DNA strands. The products, around 100 nanometers in diameter, are eight times larger and three times more complex than what could be built with a simple crystalline DNA array, vastly expanding the space of possible structures. Other nanoscale structures or machines built by Dr. Seeman and his collaborators including a nanoscale walking biped, truncated DNA octahedrons, and sequence-dependent molecular switch arrays. Dr. Seeman has exploited structural features of DNA thought to be used in genetic recombination to operate his nanoscale devices, tapping into the very processes underlying all life.

The advances in DNA nanotechnology keep coming, and many observers are wondering if this will be the path that leads us to the next Industrial Revolution. Only time — and many more experiments — will tell.

Robot Arm Places Atoms and Molecules With 100% Accuracy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resources: 

Ned Seeman‘s Home Page
http://seemanlab4.chem.nyu.edu/

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up

Comments

And SG1 thought the first Replicators would be made of large blocks. Forget that, we're already making the nano-scale Replicator blocks!

Can anyone find the DNA sequences for the strands that make the robot arms?

How are they controlled?

There's no such thing as 100% accuracy. I think what you're going for, here, is sufficient accuracy.

Actually, I think the caption and the illustration are both outstanding.

Wow!

CAT-scan MRI resolution is currently about submillimeter. We need to gain many order of magnitude there. Then we will walk in a telephone booth here, to emerge in a similar telephone booth on another planet!

Marco ( @mgua on twitter )

Actually your copy of the illustrated primer was meant for me... Just as well dad made a deal to get me one in the end!!

Not really that much different from http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/news.20060501_afm.html?Op... but i'll have to read the article to get more details.

I just can't wait for my new illustrated primer to be compiled!

Combine nanotechnology with Creator Studio (tm) creative thinking software http://www.compxpressinc.com and we will have a brave new world. I'm looking forward to it!

That is the messiest figure caption I have ever seen.

It's been right justified, thats all. Minor layout error.

So how much longer before we can use this for anti-senescence and stop aging altogether? Make death obsolete man! You have my vote.

Yeah. One really big problem with that. Where do you put 'em?

I would love to live forever, but I don't think I'd like to live in a world where everybody lived forever. The best you can do is try to make the most of the life you're given, and leave a good legacy for your kids.

You are suffering from three major logical fallacies here.

The first, assuming population growth will remain exponential. Hank Hyena made an excellent summation of this fallacy here: http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/politics/breed-or-not-breed Additionally, as sex becomes increasingly detached from procreation through a variety of contraceptive technologies, fewer and fewer people are likely to have children.

The second I am logically inferring from the second paragraph, is that you assume a world in which everyone lives forever must be unchanging, and that only by eliminating the old can space be made for the new. This is a fallacy because neural plasticity is the cause of rigid thinking as you grow older. Your brain becomes incapable of absorbing new data, and also less capable of producing new ideas. As this could be addressed with rejuvenation technologies, there is no need to assume that the future you would stagnate and grow bored with existence.

The third fallacy I am inferring from your statement about leaving a legacy for your kids, which is that immortality only comes through procreation. While this has been one of a variety of coping mechanisms for the current inevitability of death, once death has been rendered unlikely by any means but personal choice, this meme is likely to cease to have meaning. Which is better? To die and leave your children to the whims of fate, or to live and be able to interact with them for the indefinite future? To see not only your children, but your great great great great^10 grandchildren as well?

In the end that choice will be up to you, but I'd hate to see you make it based on bad data.

How ironic to speak of fallacies when you fall into the biggest of them all: Man cannot beat death.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
- Arthur C. Clarke

Incorrect. But feel free to believe what you chose. I'll take the evidence showing it's feasibility and the research into it's reality over superstition any day though.

You've got it all figured out. You are you're own little God. Good luck with that.
(and they still can't explain where the explosive came from that made the "bang")

Considering I don't find Big Bang theory plausible, I'm afraid your sarcasm is misplaced.

I deal in evidence. The evidence for extreme life extension is enormous. The human body is a machine. Age is a break down in that machine. We know why the machine breaks. Repair of that machine is possible. We are extremely close to the knowledge needed to make those repairs.

Deny the evidence if you chose. But do forgive me for choosing to accept evidence over belief.

"The human body is a machine."

No. The human body is part of a intricate biological system. A machine can be understood via very limited actions with its environment; trying to understand human beings this way is what's got us sliding toward eco-catastrophe.

Define "very limited". Even the interactions of the human body with the environment is limited.
I think the human body consists just of a biological form of technology, thus I believe it is essentially a machine.

One thing about living forever. I do think that we can (and should) stretch the human lifespan almost indefinitely in the near future, however I don't think the universe itself has an unlimited lifespan. Thus even if we can stretch it for billions of years I do believe it ends sometime.

It's like they're playing with really, really, really (...) really, really small Lego.

Scratch that I see the reference now.

But yea, as I was saying.... the revolution is already here.... it's all around us.

Now this is a revolutionary breakthrough.... But where are the references?

That's one small precisely placed molecule for man.

And one gigantic mechanosynthesis leap for Mankind.

And we take one more step into the nanotech future. Isn't tobogganing down the exponential slope towards the Singularity fun?!?

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.