It’s never easy to see your hard-won earnings disappear. When you open your 401K and see it’s just lost another 30%, you think: Holy moly, there goes my retirement. Yeah, it’s a natural reaction, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right one. We live in a world of accelerating change. Tomorrow won’t necessarily look anything like today. Not even slightly. In fact, it looks to me like the current financial crisis is the first step from a scarcity economy to a postscarcity scenario.
Let’s be clear on this. We’re not going to wake up in a magical world where iPods and McMansions grow on trees overnight. Before that can happen, every part of today’s value chain has to be overturned. Everything. Production of raw materials, transport and refining, design and engineering, manufacturing, distribution . . . even our own sense of worth. So, if today’s financial crisis is the first step, where do we go from here?
LATE SCARCITY: WHERE WE ARE TODAY
Keynesian? Marxist? With derivatives and CMOs and other abstractions propping up the value of investments, neither school of thought may be entirely valid. And with global population growth slowing, we’re going to have to re-evaluate the “good companies will be growing at 5% a year, forever” assumption that’s been the basis of corporate valuation.
We’re also already starting to see some examples of near post-scarcity. Consider computers and communications. If you’re willing to use a computer that’s a couple of years old, you can probably find a hand-me-down for free, and then happily talk to your friends around the world on Skype using free public wi-fi.
Or consider that in the last Depression, the main worry was simply getting enough food. Today, the marketplace is more worried about maintaining the marketing budgets of 170 different kinds of toothpaste than about ensuring that everyone has toothpaste. There’s a lot of padding in the system. Couple a financial crisis with this overweight, inefficient system, and you have the stage set for the first transition to post-scarcity: a comprehensive rethink of our concept of value.
TRANSITION PHASE 1: VALUE PROLIFERATION
Today, rappers sing about driving Bentleys, living in hotel-sized mansions, and drinking thousand-dollar bottles of cognac. Soon, they may be saying, “And that don’t mean shit unless you got viz and virt and rep!” We’ve already seen the beginning of this: divorce cases in which World of Warcraft’s internal currency is named as an asset; the growing importance of reputation systems such as eBay feedback; the proliferation of corporate “points” or “bux” systems that can be exchanged for real goods; the monetization of attention via friend-spamming on social networks and advertising on popular blogs. Our concept of value is expanding; it will expand even more in this phase.
Think about it. If real currency, virtual currency, corporate points, visibility, and reputation all have value, exchanges will soon crop up. Think of a FOREX (a market in which foreign currencies are exchanged) for all things we consider of value. As point examples of near post-scarcity grow and these value systems become interlocking, we’ll move beyond a single monetary value system. You’ll be able to live well under any number of value systems: reputation, visibility, network, rewards points, or even “old-fashioned” currency.
TRANSITION PHASE 2: UNSEEN GOLDEN-AGE
The second phase of the transition to post-scarcity is the scariest, but only if you look at it from today’s POV.
What’s hard to accept? Well, multiple interlocking value systems require comprehensive metrics and tracking. Read: surveillance. We could easily find ourselves in a propagational economy, where a person’s entire value is based on their Attention Index (their visibility to other people) and Monetization Effectiveness (how well they sell.)
Yuck," you say.
…divorce cases in which World of Warcraft’s internal currency is named as an asset; the proliferation of corporate “points”… our concept of value is expanding.
But what if advances in manufacturing efficiencies make it possible to live well, simply by interacting with friends and going about your life? What if below-replacement-level birthrates and advances in biotechnology meant you could check out of the system by claiming a piece of unused desert and planting a house? This surveillance economy might be a very easy place to live.
The end of this phase would come rapidly if Drexler-level nanomachines (molecular manufacturing) made the production of material stuff essentially free, and took the future worth of the entire value chain to zero. If it costs nothing to make the machines to find and refine the raw materials, or to grow the transportation network, two of the “insurmountable” obstacles to post-scarcity disappear. Even without this near-magical technology, bioassembly and other methods will slowly erode the value of raw materials refining, transportation, and manufacturing. In either case, this is an even bigger economic rethink than the one we’re going through today.
TRANSITION PHASE 3: MAGICAL IDEAS
True nanotech is limited only by the energy we put into it. In this time, unthinkable mega-engineering projects become feasible: growing a global network for finding, refining, and transporting raw materials; producing hundreds of space elevators for easy access to extraterrestrial resources; assembling magical factories along every coastline.
In this phase: we are truly free to dream and big ideas are the currency. The dreamers and designers who can imagine the best ways to change the world will become the “economic” giants of their time. The big issue will be how to coordinate these visions, and to eliminate or minimize disruptive ones.
This phase ends when the systems for effortless production of all our dreams are in place. Artificial intelligences or powerful semantic processing make this unlimited capability accessible to anyone. We are now free to imagine what we want — and have it delivered on demand.
TRUE POST-SCARCITY
Speak your wishes to the air and it will deliver. The seamless nanotech/biotech skeins distributed through the earth and the solar system make every wish possible. The only remaining question: where do your rights end and someone else’s begin?
Now, sit back and think: even without life extension, I might see every phase of the transition to true post-scarcity in my lifetime. And remember that thought the next time you check your brokerage account. It is the end of the world as you know it. And that is perfectly fine.
You lost me at "No eyes." I would like to keep mine.
People, take these comments with a heavy dose of salt. Obviously you are going to find more educated and less educated members of any religion,...
Life imitates art! One of my favorite sci-fi novels is Limbo (1952) by Bernard Wolfe. He envisions a world where people get amputations so they...
First, most of these were predictions made by Arthur C Clarke decades ago. And two, they suppose that natural evolution is going to be allowed to...
Comments
Hi everyone.
Interresting article but for me it is still very unbelievable. But not because I disagree that scarcity will eventually diminish and vanish in a not too-distant future...
It's rather that the authors imagination of the future seems a bit disjointed and not really thought-through. It's like those ridiculous cartoons of futurists where everything looks like in the 50's but has rockets and jetpacks and gliding sidewalks... and phones with cords.
Of cause no one knows or can know what the future looks like. Still I think especially the transition scenario will play out very differently...
If you live in Germany -like me- you know that (with some exceptions) you are essentially entitled to payments from the state if you can't get any work. As the robotics revolution continues and gradually more and more workers -first in production and later in the service sector- are replaced by machines, the state simply will have to pay their living expenses. Exactly like it's already happening in many social democracies today. Perhaps everyone will be
So what it will come down to at this point is that those people who "own" the means of production/robots will have to pay those who are out of work -if not out of social concern then surely to prevent bloody revolution. Of cause this is an extreme scenario with a clear-cut line between "producers" and "receivers" that we will hopefully solve in a social and civilized manner.
The even more interresting question is how fast production robots themselves will be replaced by sophisticated 3D-printers. If you can simply print goods by dumping some readiliy available raw resource into a machine and reassembling it into a fully functional say ..."laptop"... then the concept of money will just vanish.
The genious of a "fully functional" 3D printer is that you'd have to build only ONE - it could cost 30 trillion $ to develop and build and it'd still be worth it. Because the second printer and every one thereafter is essentially completely free if you are smart enough to make the printers themselves slightly extensible in size.
You'd also have to have the robotic means of supplying those printers with raw material and energy obviously. No biggie though once you can print those robots as well. Also at this point in time we surely won't be limited to resources on earth.
I do expect to see the day when material becomes just another form of information. Retirement provision my ass.
But watch out of actual trojan horses with real little men inside your small microwave-like printer. And being Rickrolled by no less a figure than the man himself.
Reminds me of "Forbidden Planet".
Hi,
I've been looking into post-scarcity a while now, and link it strongly with an end to the need for any medium of exchange. You see economic giants being a part of the scenery in an environment where everything is available at no cost. So why money? Why corporations at all? Isn't the trend (see Linux, OSS and loose non-hierarchical social-sites like flickr) towards decentralization? The way I understand it, you only need a medium of exchange to distribute scarce goods and services. Once they become abundant, there's no point to money anymore. This of course entails other radical changes to the way society ticks, including an end to ownership, but you don't seem to have looked into that aspect of scarcity and abundance.
Have you looked at The Venus Project? Jacque Fresco has been talking about purposefully designing our way towards post-scarcity for decades. He sees the world quite differently to your interpretation.
What I fail to understand in your vision is what humans will do to earn money when all goods and services can be produced without the need for human labor? The idea that we all scrabble about for attention like children does not appeal to me at all. Not all of us are comfortable in the limelight.
Cheers
Toby
Toby... I totally back you up on that one!
Thank you for posting this!
Post new comment