H+: I might spend the whole day thinking about politics, economics — thinking about solutions to knotty human problems — and then I start thinking that a lot of this is hardwired. Maybe nothing really good is going to happen unless we change our wiring. Unless we actually technically evolve. Is that part of the intrigue with biotechnology?
DUNCAN: Yeah, it is. I actually agree with Gregory Stock on a lot of this. He just thinks this stuff is inevitable. We have the technology now to alter the germ line. Somebody’s going to do it somewhere. It’s more a matter of figuring out how to do it safely and manage it. So I would agree with the notion that we’re going to be manipulating evolution. It’s not even a question of if anymore; it’s a question of when and how.
Germline Engineering
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germline_ engineering
David Ewing Duncan
www.davidewingduncan.net
By the way, know what? I said the whole "risk to being reduced to pets" was an idle question, but if you want me to play at this game, I will...
Don't want to hijack this thread in a Randian apologia direction, especially since I do find her elitism more than a bit off-putting (though I do...
>If we can't define intelligence then the project of attempting to create it will always be incoheren
No, we can't define exactly...
Have you actually read anything Rand ever wrote? Or did you get that idea purely from other people who also haven't read anything Rand ever wrote...
Comments
Post new comment