I have not dedicated a column to a discussion of a quote before, but I had forgotten about this old chestnut and thought it merited comment. Let me begin by saying that there are a few questionable specifics in the quote. I don’t know if people fear thought more than torture, cancer or the death of their children. And surely all thought isn’t terrible or unafraid of hell, as I’m sure Russell knew. With those caveats out-of-the-way, let’s proceed.
Russell thought that most people don’t like to think, as another of his quotes reveals: “Most people would rather die than think; in fact, they do so.” When he says that people “fear thought,” he is giving a reason why many people don’t like to think. Of course persons reject thinking because of laziness or inability or other reasons too, but fear is a major inhibitor of thought. But why?
People reject thinking not just because it is hard, but because they worry it will undermine their long-held, comfortable beliefs. Having taught university philosophy for many years I have seen this first hand. Students often dread thinking about controversial topics like politics, ethics, and religion. But probe even deeper. If you start thinking, you may reject not only god and country but love, friendship, freedom and more. You may discover that what is called love is reducible to chemical attraction; that friendship is mutual reciprocity; that morality is what those in power decree; that messengers of the gods are often psychologically deranged; that freedom is an illusion. You may even find that life is absurd. Thought breeds the fear that we will lose our equilibrium, that we will be forced to see the world anew. We fear thinking because what we and others think matters to us.
I used to tell my students to not believe that ideas and thoughts don’t matter–that they exist in the ivory tower with no significance for the real world–as if beer and football are more important. No. Thoughts and ideas incite political revolutions; they inspire people to sacrifice their lives for just and unjust causes alike, often killing others in the process. They determine how one treats both friends and enemies, and whether family is more important than money.
Even the most abstract thinking affects the world. Non-euclidean geometry or symbolic logic are about as abstract as thinking gets–yet you can’t understand Einsteinian gravity without the one or run computers without the other. Thinking matters to us, to others, and to our world. That’s one reason why we fear it so much–it shakes our foundations.
But not just any thinking will do. If we truly love thinking we will engage in careful and conscientious thinking informed by the best reason and evidence available–our dignity consists, in large part, on good thinking. More than forty years ago I entered a university where the following inscription was etched on its library’s wall. I have never forgotten those words I read as a teenager in the intervening forty years.
John G. Messerly, Ph.D taught for many years in both the philosophy and computer science departments at the University of Texas at Austin. His most recent book is The Meaning of Life: Religious, Philosophical, Scientific, and Transhumanist Perspectives. He blogs daily on issues of futurism and the meaning of life at reasonandmeaning.com