Sign In

Remember Me

Propaganda 2.0 and the rise of ‘narrative networks’

DARPA, the Pentagon’s advanced concepts think-tank, is looking to take propaganda to the next level and they’re hoping to do so by controlling the very way their targets perceive and interpret the flow of incoming information. The Pentagon believes that by engaging in ‘narrative control’ they can alter an individual’s grasp on reality and the way in which they evaluate current events. Simply put, DARPA is looking to shape minds with stories.

Now, this isn’t an entirely new concept. The notion of narrative control, or narrative networks, has been bunted around for a few years now.

It’s been said that history books are written by the victors. Well, these days hopeful victors are trying to write current events. State actors are increasingly disclosing information in a way that constructs a kind of story. It’s through the careful construction of desirable narratives that state actors are hoping to control the beliefs and actions of targeted audiences. It’s a classic case of the pen being mightier than the sword — but in this case it’s a pen that digs deep into the very psyche of the individual.

The United States has been engaging in narrative control for quite some time now. Most recently, during the Arab Spring, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton weaved a tale that suggested a certain level of inevitability to the events unfolding in the Middle East. One by one, she contended, authoritarian and fundamentalist nations were being overthrown by angry and forward-looking populaces. It’ll only be a matter of time, Clinton argued, before the entire Middle East goes through a transformation that sees all its countries embrace democracy, secular institutions, and unprecedented freedoms.

Now I’m not suggesting that this isn’t a valid interpretation of events. It very well may be. But what’s important to understand here is that the U.S. is presenting this narrative in a very overt and calculated way. For many of those in the Middle East, the story is most certainly compelling and potentially inspiring. And for those sitting on the fence or considering radical action, this story of apparent inevitability may compel them to join the “winning team.” It’s through this kind of narrative control and reality building that the U.S. hopes to fight terrorism and the spread of radical Islam.

But now DARPA wants to take this further and make it more scientific and systematic. They recently put out a request for research proposals in the areas of:

  • Quantitative analysis of narratives
  • Understanding the effects narratives have on human psychology and its affiliated neurobiology
  • Modeling, simulating, and sensing-especially in stand-off modalities-these narrative influences

DARPA would like to revolutionize the study of narrative influence by “advancing narrative analysis and neuroscience so as to create new narrative influence sensors, doubling status quo capacity to forecast narrative influence.”

This is pretty heavy stuff. They’re asking scientists to “take narratives and make them quantitatively analyzable in a rigorous, transparent and repeatable fashion.” Once such a system is put into place, the Pentagon will be able to detect terrorists or other non-state actors who have been indoctrinated with a particular ideology or worldview, and then respond with a counter-message of its own. As Dawn Lim notes in Wired, “They can also target groups vulnerable to terrorists’ recruiting tactics with their own counter-messaging.”

Lim describes how the project will unfold:

In the first 18-month phase of the program, the Pentagon wants researchers to study how stories infiltrate social networks and alter our brain circuits. One of the stipulated research goals: to “explore the function narratives serve in the process of political radicalization and how they can influence a person or group’s choice of means (such as indiscriminate violence) to achieve political ends.”

Once scientists have perfected the science of how stories affect our neurochemistry, they will develop tools to “detect narrative influence.” These tools will enable “prevention of negative behavioral outcomes … and generation of positive behavioral outcomes, such as building trust.” In other words, the tools will be used to detect who’s been controlled by subversive ideologies, better allowing the military to drown out that message and win people onto their side.

“The government is already trying to control the message, so why not have the science to do it in a systematic way?” said the researcher familiar with the project.

When the project enters into a second 18-month phase, it’ll use the research gathered to build “optimized prototype technologies in the form of documents, software, hardware and devices.” What will these be? Existing technology can carry out micro-facial feature analysis, and measure the dilation of blood vessels and eye pupils. MRI machines can determine which parts of your brain is lighting up when it responds to stories. Darpa wants to do even better.

DARPA is even calling for devices that detect the influence of stories in unseen ways: “Efforts that rely solely on standoff/non-invasive/non-detectable sensors are highly encouraged.”

“Stories are important in security contexts,” DARPA argues, “[stories] change the course of insurgencies, frame negotiations, play a role in political radicalization, influence the methods and goals of violent social movements.” Indeed, they’ve been thinking a lot about this recently, as indicated by their April workshop to discuss the neurobiology of narratives.

When it comes to security, little consideration is given to ethics. Now, while I’m somewhat partial to this approach on account of its bloodlessness, I have to admit that the potential for abuse is astonishing. Once these narrative networks reach full maturity they could be used to indoctrinate not just enemy populations, but more familiar ones as well. The very ways in which domestic affairs are perceived could be colored by a security department hoping to create a docile and abiding population.

That said, the efficacy of narrative networks has yet to be determined. The Internet and other communications networks may serve as a kind of prophylactic against narrow bands of information. Moreover, populations may become primed against such efforts in the same way current societies are (relatively) immune to traditional and obvious methods of propaganda.

As a final word, this topic interests me greatly as it relates to memetics, memetic engineering, and the whole concept of cultural health. In this context, the struggle against religious fundamentalism is a struggle against the onset and dissemination of bad memes. Fundamentalist memeplexes can be interpreted as information viruses that are running amok in the human population. Perhaps it’s not too outrageous to suggest that we should counter bad ideas with good ideas — or at least better ideas that lead to more rational thinking, criticality and independent thought.

The best defense against religious extremism is a mind primed to reject those ideas in the first place.

George Dvorsky is a Canadian futurist, ethicist, and transhumanist. He serves on the board of directors of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. This article was originally published at his blog Sentient Developments.

21 Comments

  1. I am so reassured that there is such an abundance of wise, well intentioned and trustworthy leaders available to decide which ideas are good and which ones are bad, so that I no longer have to do this myself. I wonder who chooses their ides for them?

  2. There is already a model for this. It’s called Fox news.

    • If you trust any of the TV news networks or major newspapers you’re wasting time reading this.

  3. what would be nice is a an open source app or a device that could analyse a story the government or any organisation is hawking and output the possible messages/propaganda to the individual who in turn could make a rational informed decision.

    • Maneesh, my work isn’t “open source”, but I have been developing tools for some time that combine text analysis with some innovative ideas in machine learning and data visualization to do exactly that.

      There are a number of people do interesting work in this exact area and I would start by looking at some of the winners and others applying ot the Knight Data Challenge and related projects to learn more.

      See http://newschallenge.tumblr.com/

      • Hey Peter, thats great to know that there is work happening in that domain. I am a Fashion photographer by profession but fully believe in the power of the ICT’s in improving our society’s by combating vested interests of political and corporate forces. Thanks for the insight, will follow the progress. would love to see your work to, share a link on FB (Maneesh Mandanna).

  4. This sounds like a wet dream of Goebbels..

  5. Wag the dog

  6. Anonymous is attempting to combat this.

  7. our consensus reality is ALREADY like this, made in the same way .. dappa is simply wishing to extend the mechanics ..

    and of course there is an easy solution/antidote … know thyself

    that means, know what the self is, how knowing happens, and identify with the awareness that we are and not what we are aware of …

    dappa can never catch you 🙂

  8. Wow. I can’t believe that DARPA is actually trying to find new ways to control people.Though I manipulating an average person is unfortunately very easy with just normal propaganda (hitler,other dictators and fantastic speakers)I hate the idea of finding out how narratives specified to affect the populace most efficiently and effectively works out.

    • An intelligent answer – no BS – which makes a plsenaat change

  9. This is scary. Big Brother aside, what happens when this finds its way into private hands? Are we looking at a future of news-as-propoganda and engineered memetic advertising?

    • News IS, all too often, propaganda.

      • Any communication, in so far as we care about the effects of our words, smacks of ‘narrative engineering’. Honesty is just one methodology in that tool kit.

  10. This is, indeed, a troubling article.

    As an aside, it is interesting that DARPA is looking to scientists for its “narrative control.” It is ignoring the people who have successfully controlled narratives for centuries — i.e., writers, story tellers, artists, singers, composers, actors, movie makers…

    victor s.
    victor-storiguard.blogspot.com

    • You forgot politicians, advertisers, and journalists.

  11. Am I the only one who finds this scary? I mean, fair enough that extremists are exposed to basically the same narrative networks we’re talking about here, fair enough that we should fight extremism with every weapon in our arsenal… but it sounds like a slippery slope to Newspeak to me. Or am I just being paranoid?

    • Could this page be part of the engineered narrative?

Leave a Reply