Editor's Blog

Valkyrie Ice
09/07/2010 - 22:10

A couple of months ago, H+ had an article on quadcopters that I really didn’t pay much attention to. It was a neat toy but I skimmed the article, and stuck it away in the back of my head as “interesting, but not important.”

I was wrong. You see, quadcopters have the potential to “change everything” in a major paradigm shift, if properly developed.

Samuel H. Kenyon
09/06/2010 - 19:56

Some have pointed out the supposed increase in multitasking during recent decades.  An overlapping issue is the increase in raw information that humans have access to.  It is certainly a fascinating sociocultural change.  However, humans are not capable of true multitasking.  First I will describe what humans do have presently, and then I will discuss what future humans might be capable of.

Ray Kurzweil
09/02/2010 - 00:17

This came from Ray Kurzweil in response to a question I sent to him and several others who I consider to be optimistic about the future of biotechnology.  Ray responded today (he's the first respondent)  and I thought it was important enough to run immediately.

This was my inquiry:  In an article titled “Rethinking the Promise of Genomics” for h+, Ray Kurzweil’ coauthor Terry Grossman wrote that he no longer believes that “the exponential growth of genetic data would open a new world of diagnostic and therapeutic applications.”  And in a recent interview in Der Spiegel,  Craig Venter expressed some apparent disappointment in the results of the Human Genome Project, saying, among other things, “We have learned nothing from the genome.”
 
Is it time to rethink the promise of genomics?  

Ray's response is below.

Giulio Prisco
09/01/2010 - 22:18

See Also: A Cosmist Manifesto (Excerpt)

The term Cosmism seems to have been introduced by Konstantin Tsiolokovsky and other Russian Cosmists around 1900.  Now, Ben Goertzel's Cosmist Manifesto (published by Humanity+ Press and available on Amazon) gives it new life and a new twist for the 21st century.  Cosmism, as Goertzel presents it, is a practical philosophy for the posthuman era.  Rooted in Western and Eastern philosophy as well as modern technology and science, it is a way of understanding ourselves and our universe that makes sense now, and will keep on making sense as advanced technology exerts its transformative impact in the unfolding future.  Goertzel weaves a philosophic tapestry using AI, nanotechnology, uploading, immortality, psychedelic drugs, meditation, future social structures, psi phenomena, alien and cetacean intelligence and the Singularity.  The Cosmist perspective is shown to make plain old common sense of even the wildest future possibilities.



Ben Goertzel
09/01/2010 - 22:17

This is an excerpt (chapter) from A Cosmist Manifeso: Practical Philosophy for the Posthuman Age by Ben Goertzel, published by Humanity+ Press.

See also: A Cosmist Manifesto: An Advocacy

Some Cosmist Principles  

If my take on Cosmism could be fully summarized in a list of bullet points, I wouldn't write a whole manifesto about it ̶ I'd just write a few bullet points. But, even so, it seems worthwhile to start with a few bullet points, just to whet your appetite for the more thorough and useful exposition to come. Some of these bullets are rather abstract and initially may come across fairly opaque. That is a risk of compressing things into bullet-point form. Read the full text of the Manifesto, think on it a bit, and hopefully you will see that all these ideas have simple, practical, everyday meanings.

Hannah Gilmartin
09/01/2010 - 13:11

An interview with Timothy Taylor in a recent issue of New Scientist highlights how, contrary to Darwin’s theory, human evolution is more complex than simply “survival of the fittest.”  In fact, many of contemporary humanity’s physical features are “weaker” than the earlier model due to the technologies used by our ancestor hominins (australopithecines) and early Homo sapiens.  Examples of accumulated biological deficits include soft nails, hairless bodies and weak jaws.  It is also now clear that the use of primitive tools to create slings (to carry young infants) may have been a key facilitator allowing for our big brains, as development could continue outside the space-restricting womb.

James Peyer
09/01/2010 - 07:50

Popular media coverage of biotechnology is saturated with talk of “revolution” — the time when genetic engineering, synthetic biology, and personalized medicine will change our lives in more ways than we can imagine.  These technologies, we are assured, are right around the corner.  But having heard such promises for well over a decade, I find myself asking:

Are we there yet?

In the past few decades, biology and medicine have overcome problems previously thought insurmountable. But in a world where we expect the exponential progress predicted by Moore's Law, is biotechnology living up to the name "revolution"?

I think it has a way to go.

R.U. Sirius
08/30/2010 - 21:36

Currently a professor at Xiamen Universty, where he teaches theoretical physics and computer science, Hugo de Garis is legendary in AI and futurist circles.  He’s been working on neural networks and “artificial brains” since the 1990s.  de Garis is also an advocate of Femtotechnology — the notion that we could operate technologically at a level a million times smaller than nanotech.  In 2005, de Garis published a controversial book called Artilect Wars that predicted an upcoming “gigadeath” war between Terrans (those who want to remain human) and “Cosmists” (those who want to unite with AIs and become posthuman and post-terrestrial).  

Teaser Image

Alex McKeown
08/30/2010 - 09:07

A Dutch physicist, Eindhoven-based Peter Meijer, has developed a device called vOICe that allows blind people to see, using the aural information entering their ears. The device converts visual information received by a camera into soundscapes, which then gives an aural representation of what the camera sees.

R.U. Sirius
08/25/2010 - 21:38

Film Review

A Hole in the Head, Spectacle Films

I have to make a confession.  I have a soft posterior fontanelle.  When I press on that spot, my head indents noticeably — enough that you can actually see it.  Furthermore, I frequently feel a sort of need to do this.  And when I do it, it seems to help me feel less sleepyheaded and more focussed.  If I'm feeling a bit woozy, it helps me feel less so.  And, indeed, sometimes I feel as though I'd like to drill right into it — as though there is some sort of psychic G spot hungering to be stimulated and satisfied.  Naturally, I've been intrigued by trepanning — the practice of intentionally drilling small holes in the skull.  

Join the h+ Community

OMG I missed the Singularity?